Reliable reviews depend on knowing where information comes from and what that information can—and cannot—prove. This policy explains how Hosting And Domain Reviews approaches sources for coverage of hosting, AI software, marketing tools and other digital products.
Choosing Sources for the Question
There is no single source that answers every buying question. A vendor’s pricing page may explain the advertised offer, while documentation may clarify access or usage rules. Independent reporting can add context, and actual product access can provide a view of a particular workflow. We consider the source’s relevance, recency and limitations before using it to support a statement.
Evidence varies by product. A newly launched tool may have little independent information available; an established service may have extensive documentation and public feedback. When important evidence is missing, we aim to make that gap clear.
Types of Sources We Use
Official product and seller information
Sales pages, pricing pages, product documentation, terms and refund policies can help identify what a seller offers and the conditions it states. They are useful primary sources for the offer, but promotional claims are not automatically independent proof of results.
Direct observations and demonstrations
When available, product access, screenshots or demonstrations can help explain an interface or workflow. A seller-controlled demo may show a product under favorable conditions, so it does not establish long-term reliability or typical outcomes. We do not describe a review as hands-on unless direct use actually occurred.
Independent and institutional sources
Depending on the subject, we may use established publications, original research, recognized technical resources or official consumer guidance. We prefer sources that directly address the claim, and we avoid treating general research as proof about a particular branded product.
Customer feedback and community discussions
Comments and user reviews may reveal concerns to investigate, but individual experiences may be unverified, incomplete or based on a different version. They are not assumed to represent all users.
Separating Claims from Evidence
When a material statement comes from a seller and has not been independently confirmed, we aim to attribute it clearly. Claims about earnings, traffic, unlimited access, time savings or guaranteed results need particular care. Testimonials and promotional examples do not establish what a typical buyer will achieve.
Affiliate Links and Supporting References
An affiliate link may lead to a seller’s offer and may generate a commission for the website. It is a commercial link, not independent evidence of quality. Where practical, we link to an original or authoritative source for factual support. A link to a source does not mean we endorse every claim made by its publisher.
For more about our commercial relationships, see the Earning Disclaimer.
Conflicts, Changes and Corrections
Sources can disagree or become outdated. When assessing a conflict, we consider what each source actually says, when it was published and how directly it addresses the issue. Pricing, availability and terms can change after an article is published; verify important details with the seller before buying.
If you spot an incorrect statement or a stronger source, please use our contact page. Include the article URL, the specific passage and a supporting reference. We review credible requests and update material errors when appropriate. Providing information or product access does not guarantee coverage or a favorable review.
Read our Editorial Methodology for the broader review process and meet Sasi Digital.